|
|
|
|
||
|
Will Hong Kong follow the IASB and change its simplified accounting standard for SMEs?
By
Kannie Wu -
|
|
|||
|
|
Both the HK SME FRF & FRS and the proposed IFRS for SMEs were developed with the main purpose of reducing the burden of the more complex financial reporting requirements on SMEs, while at the same time providing information useful to users. However, these two sets of standards have noteworthy differences. The salient ones are summarised as follows:
Under the proposed IFRS for SMEs, any entity that does not have public accountability and publishes general purpose financial statements for external users may adopt the proposed standard. The proposed standard does not have quantified size criteria. Each jurisdiction can have its own criteria. At present, companies incorporated in Hong Kong have to elect for the application of section 141D of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance before they are qualified for preparing their financial statements under the HK FRF & FRS, whereas overseas entities have to meet the public accountability and size criteria under the HK FRF & FRS. Section 141D of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance has somewhat restrictive qualifying criteria. In March 2007, the HK SAR government issued a consultation paper on proposals to improve the accounting and auditing provisions of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance. One of the key proposals is to relax the qualifying criteria to enable more private companies to take advantage of simplified reporting and disclosure requirements. Because of this proposed legislative amendment, Hong Kong incorporated companies currently not qualified to adopt the HK FRF & FRS may be eligible to do so in future. Let us wait and see if there are any changes to the simplified financial reporting regime in Hong Kong and thelegislative financial reporting requirementsfor Hong Kong incorporated
companies.
|
|||
|
|
|
Main | Next |
|